<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post1539192380339538988..comments</id><updated>2008-04-26T13:40:51.611-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Mormon Mudphud: A female bishop...</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/feeds/1539192380339538988/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html'/><author><name>MormonMudphud</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11878710620106860747</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>10</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-7060307299103555578</id><published>2008-04-26T13:40:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-26T13:40:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>I say human and he made a mistake.</title><content type='html'>I say human and he made a mistake.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/7060307299103555578'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/7060307299103555578'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html?showComment=1209242400000#c7060307299103555578' title=''/><author><name>MormonMudphud</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11878710620106860747</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='01653865503109392685'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-1539192380339538988' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/posts/default/1539192380339538988' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-8181143802590465439</id><published>2008-04-26T12:35:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-26T12:35:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Do you think that Joseph's practice of polygamy sh...</title><content type='html'>Do you think that Joseph's practice of polygamy shows he was a fallen prophet or does it just mean he was human and he made a mistake or is it something else?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/8181143802590465439'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/8181143802590465439'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html?showComment=1209238500000#c8181143802590465439' title=''/><author><name>Sanford</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15276948499916713520</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-1539192380339538988' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/posts/default/1539192380339538988' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-3749369829124649796</id><published>2008-04-26T08:42:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-26T08:42:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>I do think it was wrong that Joseph Smith practice...</title><content type='html'>I do think it was wrong that Joseph Smith practiced polygamy.  I also think it was wrong that he married a 14 y.o. girl, which was way too young even in the 19th century.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I'm not sure whether polygamy is always wrong, but I do think it is usually wrong.  It does seem to arise naturally in many different cultures across the world.  I can't see how it could be in the interests of a woman to be in a polygamous relationship.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;My great-grandparents were polygamists.  My grandma (who grew up in a polygamous household) thought it was awful.  Many women didn't want to be in polygamous marriages, but they thought they needed to live polygamy in order to receive exaltation.  There is no doubt that polygamy was often abusive in 19th century Mormonism.  That's why I think the Church should apologize.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/3749369829124649796'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/3749369829124649796'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html?showComment=1209224520000#c3749369829124649796' title=''/><author><name>MormonMudphud</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11878710620106860747</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='01653865503109392685'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-1539192380339538988' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/posts/default/1539192380339538988' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-3246368631078880589</id><published>2008-04-26T03:01:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-26T03:01:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Why do you think it is long overdue?   Is polygamy...</title><content type='html'>Why do you think it is long overdue?   Is polygamy inherently wrong irrespective of time and place?   I am willing to accept that a change may come.  But for practical and doctrinal reasons (and inertia too) I think it will not be anytime soon.  Do think it was wrong when Joseph Smith practiced polygamy?  Or is just wrong now?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/3246368631078880589'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/3246368631078880589'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html?showComment=1209204060000#c3246368631078880589' title=''/><author><name>Sanford</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15276948499916713520</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-1539192380339538988' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/posts/default/1539192380339538988' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-7518785148462744741</id><published>2008-04-24T21:45:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-24T21:45:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>I don't really differentiate between the Church ho...</title><content type='html'>I don't really differentiate between the Church holding out and God telling the brethren to make a change.  I just think it's inevitable.  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;President Kimball was a very close relative of mine, and I have never had the impression that his revelation on blacks was something magical from heaven.  It was just long overdue change of a policy that had its roots in racism.  I don't think it's a coincidence that Delbert Stapley was near death when the revelation finally went forward.  (See Stapley letter to George Romney for a glimpse into a racist apostle's mind.  That man literally believed that God would strike down any man who supported civil rights even outside the Church.)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;As far as D&amp;C 132...here are my thoughts:  God destroying Emma if she wouldn't allow Joseph to have as many virgins as God gave him?  I guarantee that will not survive 5 more years in our scriptures.  Maybe not even 6 months, in light of the FLDS publicity.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Keep in mind, the D&amp;C contained a denial of polygamy for years (even when it was being practiced in secret).  The D&amp;C was then amended with removal of the denial of polygamy.  If they can amend it to add polygamy, why not amend it to remove polygamy?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/7518785148462744741'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/7518785148462744741'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html?showComment=1209098700000#c7518785148462744741' title=''/><author><name>MormonMudphud</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11878710620106860747</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='01653865503109392685'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-1539192380339538988' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/posts/default/1539192380339538988' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-1380103121470560198</id><published>2008-04-24T20:47:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-24T20:47:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>On women and the priesthood - Do you think it will...</title><content type='html'>On women and the priesthood - Do you think it will happen within 30 years because that's how long the Church can hold out or do you think that's when God will tell the brethren to make the change?  Or both?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;On section 132 - that seems like an even more unlikely event to me.  I think the Church can effectively ignore 132 it so chooses, but to remove it - I just can imagine it.  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;You must see some malleability in the Church that I don't</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/1380103121470560198'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/1380103121470560198'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html?showComment=1209095220000#c1380103121470560198' title=''/><author><name>Sanford Barrett</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15276948499916713520</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-1539192380339538988' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/posts/default/1539192380339538988' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-9053604091668995831</id><published>2008-04-24T20:38:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-24T20:38:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Heck yeah women are going to get the priesthood--i...</title><content type='html'>Heck yeah women are going to get the priesthood--in 200 years!&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;But seriously, I think it'll happen within the next 30 years.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;D&amp;C 132 will be removed or amended first.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/9053604091668995831'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/9053604091668995831'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html?showComment=1209094680000#c9053604091668995831' title=''/><author><name>MormonMudphud</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11878710620106860747</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='01653865503109392685'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-1539192380339538988' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/posts/default/1539192380339538988' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-8179576982466512825</id><published>2008-04-24T20:17:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-24T20:17:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>I have often pondered how it's going to work when ...</title><content type='html'>I have often pondered how it's going to work when women get the priesthood.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Do you really think it's a given that women will get the priesthood?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Sometimes I think it’s just a matter of time and other times I think it will never happen.  If it does happen, I see occurring sort like the way blacks got the priesthood.   The Church will be so far behind the curve in terms of what is culturally acceptable that it will either have to act or suffer a great deal of scorn.  It will resist until it is too painful and then it will make the change.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/8179576982466512825'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/8179576982466512825'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html?showComment=1209093420000#c8179576982466512825' title=''/><author><name>Sanford Barrett</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15276948499916713520</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-1539192380339538988' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/posts/default/1539192380339538988' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-7886103339786899563</id><published>2008-04-24T07:56:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-24T07:56:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Then who's going to take care of the kids when the...</title><content type='html'>Then who's going to take care of the kids when they're both busy?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I guess they could have non-overlapping schedules.  Or they could choose empty nesters.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/7886103339786899563'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/7886103339786899563'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html?showComment=1209048960000#c7886103339786899563' title=''/><author><name>MormonMudphud</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11878710620106860747</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='01653865503109392685'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-1539192380339538988' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/posts/default/1539192380339538988' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-8956696325493659547</id><published>2008-04-24T07:43:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-24T07:43:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>I envision  the co-bishop. Husband and wife functi...</title><content type='html'>I envision  the co-bishop. Husband and wife function together as bishop, and ward members choose which one to talk to.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/8956696325493659547'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/1539192380339538988/comments/default/8956696325493659547'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html?showComment=1209048180000#c8956696325493659547' title=''/><author><name>Caroline</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00895275783472155916</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://mormonmudphud.blogspot.com/2008/04/female-bishop.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5699661879277522253.post-1539192380339538988' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5699661879277522253/posts/default/1539192380339538988' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>